Journal Articles
Disclaimer: The materials in this section are from sources outside the U.S. Government and should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein or as official U.S. policy.
Chollet, Derek. UN, REDISCOVERED. National Interest, March/April 2007, pp. 57-61.
Full text available upon request
"After six years of tempestuous U.S.-UN relations, the next few months could prove a turning point. The proximate cause is the unusual confluence of four events: the ascension o f a new UN secretary-general, Ban Ki Moon; the end of John Bolton's stormy ambassadorship and the nomination of his skilled replacement, Zalmay Khalilzad; and the Democratic takeover in Congress. But a larger, more impersonal reason also contributes. In Washington, there is a greater sense of sobriety about the limits of America's power and influence to act alone -- and more appreciation for strong, effective international institutions." Derek Chollet is a fellow at the CSIS and a non-resident fellow at the Brookings Institution. He served as a speechwriter at the U.S. mission to the UN during the Clinton Administration.
Rupp, Richard. BEST INTENTIONS OR FALSE PROMISES: MULTILATERAL INTERVENTIONS IN DARFUR, AFGHANISTAN, AND SOUTHERN LEBANON. Mediterranean Quarterly, Spring 2007, pp. 85-106.
Full text available upon request
"Regardless of an intervention’s designation or the rules of engagement, the international community’s efforts to stem armed conflicts and ameliorate human suffering have known only modest success in recent years. Indeed, ongoing conflicts in Darfur, Afghanistan, and southern Lebanon illuminate the daunting challenges confronting Western-led intervention efforts. As armed conflicts take the lives of thousands of people throughout the world each day, and new failed states and civil wars emerge, demands for Western action will continue. In this essay" the author examines "recent trends and developments affecting multilateral interventions, with special attention devoted to the involvement of the UN, NATO, and the US government. Each of these actors is inextricably linked, and yet their leadership has proven largely incapable of designing satisfactory relationships governing the design and management of the missions upon which they have jointly embarked." Richard Rupp is associate professor and acting head of the Department of History and Political Science at Purdue University Calumet.
Nowak, Manfred. WHAT PRACTICES CONSTITUTE TORTURE?: US AND UN STANDARDS. Human Rights Quarterly, November 2006, pp. 809-843.
Full text available via ProQuest
"This article is a response to the attempts of the US
government to redefine torture in a highly restrictive
sense and at the same time distinguishing it from other
forms of cruel inhuman or degrading treatment (CIDT). To
this end, the author undertakes a short analysis of the
understanding of the concept of torture and CIDT by the
present US Government and asks whether this
interpretation corresponds to the definition of torture
in Article 1, Convention against Torture (CAT). An
analysis of the techniques authorized by US Secretary of
Defense Donald Rumsfeld for the interrogation of
Guantanamo detainees is also carried out in light of
applicable UN standards and international case law."
Manfred Nowak is Professor of Constitutional Law and
Human Rights at the University of Vienna and Director of
the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Human Rights (BIM). He
holds an LLM. from Columbia University, New York and a
Ph.D. from Vienna University. Since 1996, he has served
as Judge at the Human Rights Chamber for Bosnia and
Herzegovina, and, since 2000, as Chairperson of the
European Master Programme on Human Rights and
Democratization (EMA) in Venice.
Lebovic, James H. and Erik Voeten. THE POLITICS
OF SHAME: THE CONDEMNATION OF COUNTRY HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES IN
THE UNCHR. International Studies Quarterly, December
2006, pp. 861–888.
Full text available upon request
"Although the United Nations Commission on Human Rights
served as the primary forum in which governments publicly named
and shamed others for abusing their citizens, the practices of
the commission have been largely ignored by political
scientists. To address that deficiency, this study analyzes the
actions of the commission and its members' voting records in the
1977–2001 period. It establishes that targeting and punishment
by the commission decreasingly fit the predictions of a realist
perspective, in which naming and shaming is an inherently
political exercise, and increasingly fit the predictions of a
liberal 'reputation' perspective, in which governments hold
others to their promises, and a constructivist 'social
conformity' perspective, in which governments distribute and
respond to social rewards and punishments. With the end of the
Cold War, the commission's targeting and punishment of countries
was based less on partisan ties, power politics, and the
privileges of membership, and more on those countries' actual
human rights violations, treaty commitments, and active
participation in cooperative endeavors such as peacekeeping
operations." James H. Lebovic is Associate Professor of
Political Science and International Affairs at
George Washington University. Erik Voeten is Assistant
Professor, Department of Political Science at the George
Washington University.
Soderberg, Nancy. THE U.S.-UN RELATIONSHIP - A
DIFFICULT BUT NECESSARY PARTNERSHIP. American Foreign
Policy Interests, August 2006, pp. 311-318.
Full text available upon request
"In seeking to answer the two questions that she extrapolated
from her analysis of the U.S. approach to the UN—Is the shift
from UN bashing on the part of the Bush administration real? Is
the UN up to the job?—the author provides a comprehensive
analysis of the reforms associated with the 2005 World Summit."
Nancy Soderberg is a trustee of the National Committee on
American Foreign Policy. From 1993 to 1996, she was the
third-ranking official at the National Security Council, and
from 1997 to 2001, she was a U.S. ambassador to the United
Nations. Currently a distinguished visiting scholar at the
University of North Florida, Ambassador Soderberg is the author
of The Superpower Myth: The Use and Misuse of American Might,
2005.






