Journal Articles
Disclaimer: The materials in this section are from sources outside the U.S. Government and should not be construed as an endorsement of the views or privacy policies contained therein or as official U.S. policy.
Fessenden, Helen. The Limits of
Intelligence Reform. Foreign Affairs, Nov/Dec2005, pp 106-120.
Full text available upon request
The fact that an intelligence shakeup occurred at all remains a singular accomplishment. A unique convergence of forces--the resounding success of the 9/11 Commission, growing media attention on intelligence shortcomings, shifting dynamics in Congress and the White House--allowed for some progress despite long-entrenched opposition. But even broad support in the Senate, overwhelming public opinion, and a best-selling report were not enough to move Congress nearly as far as overhaul proponents had hoped. The story thus serves as a textbook case of how the opaque ways of Washington's bureaucratic warfare undermine sound policy. Insiders used both official and unofficial levers of power to keep as much of their turf intact as they could. As with so many bills, a compromise resulted. Most worrying is that this compromise, already laden with caveats, could become a standalone accomplishment rather than part of a long-term transformation. A DNI is in place and the NCTC is up and running, but the risk of complacency is rising. Helen Fessenden, a former Senior Editor at Foreign Affairs, is Washington Editor of the Eurasia Group.
Friedman, Benjamin. HOMELAND SECURITY. Foreign Policy. Jul/Aug
2005, pp. 22-27.
Full text available via ProQuest
For the vast majority of Americans, the chances of dying in a terrorist attack are close to zero. There's a higher probability that you'll die by falling off a ladder than getting mixed up in some terrorist plot. So why is the U.S. Department of Homeland security constantly telling every American to be afraid? That's a strategy that creates widespread fear without making America any safer. U.S. homeland security efforts should focus less on what is possible and more on what is probable. Benjamin Friedman is a doctoral candidate in political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.






